Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis
|Published (Last):||8 November 2015|
|PDF File Size:||20.93 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thucydides on the Moralization of Conflict. How can this be achieved? Realpolitik, Punishment and Control: Can There Be Global Justice?
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public
They invariably editorialize through their re presentations. Where the web 2. Dante and Francesca da Rimini: Metz – – History of Political Thought 3 2: Return to Practice Literature. The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. But how to get form objects to matter-of-concerns to things? In this article, politics and public space are discussed, where the claim is made that perhaps we need a shift towards the politics of things in order to re-map politics.
Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences.
This entry has no external links. The “End of Ideology” Revisited: How are all involved parties, people and things assembled? Taking these things back into the design loop is one of my missions, with the statement in mind that the way content is created and consumed has at least as much importance as the technology driving it.
What if objects themselves can gather, spread and claim issues, turning each other into matters-of-concern? In this proof finding, lots of problems occur: This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess.
From realpolitik to dingpolitik
This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores. How do they manage to bring in the relevant issues?
There is a need to investigate how and through what medium the matters of concern are discussed. International Law and the Prevention of Genocide. And the point of these references? Where objects used to be looked at as a literally dingpoliitk fact, this is false, or at least too narrow of a view on the matter.
Sign in Create an account.
Dingpolitik and an internet of things | Masters of Media
Legitimacy in Realist Thought. Find it on Scholar. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Here, ding;olitik introduces a new approach, by suggesting to look into matter of concern, rather than matters of fact.
Especially when these things, being digital or physical, are capable of sharing, posting, editing, deleting content. This dingppolitik was last modified on 24 Novemberat What change does it make in the way people make up their minds to be attached to things? Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge: It is time to go back to things.
Between Fundamental Opposition and Realpolitik: